9th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Jun 23 2026
2:24-cv-00691-GJL Unpublished

Armstrong v. Bisignano

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment upholding the Social Security Commissioner's denial of disability benefits. The court held that the Administrative Law Judge properly discounted the claimant's testimony regarding headache severity based on specific, clear, and convincing evidence of contradictions.

Jun 23 2026
9:24-cr-00049-DLC-1 Unpublished

USA v. Brown

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea by a felon in possession of a firearm. The court also upheld the classification of the defendant's prior bank robbery conviction as a crime of violence for sentencing purposes.

Jun 22 2026
24-3341 Unpublished

Rodas Zafra v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review and remanded a Board of Immigration Appeals decision that summarily dismissed an appeal as untimely. The court held that the Board failed to provide a reasoned explanation for denying equitable tolling based on counsel's sudden illness.

Jun 22 2026
2:24-cv-01891-MLP Unpublished

Potter v. Bisignano

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court judgment upholding the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of supplemental security income disability benefits. The panel found that the administrative law judge provided substantial evidence to reject medical opinions and discount the claimant's testimony regarding symptom severity.

Jun 22 2026
22-567 Unpublished

Singh v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying a motion to reopen removal proceedings. The court upheld the agency's finding that the petitioner failed to demonstrate extreme hardship to his children required to waive the time limit for reopening.

Jun 18 2026
24-6388 Unpublished

Alves Pereira, Et Al. v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit denied a petition for review seeking asylum and withholding of removal for a Brazilian national and her children. The court found substantial evidence supported the agency's conclusion that anonymous threats did not constitute persecution and that the petitioners failed to show a well-founded fear of future harm.