5th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Jun 2 2026
25-60216 Published

Clifton Jackson; Helen Noel; William Noel Plaintiffs— v. City of Jackson, Mississippi Defendant—

The Fifth Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal for lack of standing, finding that plaintiffs alleged a concrete economic injury from paying for unusable water. However, the court affirmed the dismissal for failure to state a claim, ruling that plaintiffs failed to allege constitutionally inadequate process for their billing disputes.

Jun 2 2026
24-50769 Per Curiam

United States v. Williams

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the convictions of three defendants involved with a criminal organization known as Killers with Aggression. The court rejected challenges regarding jury instructions on firearms charges and the sufficiency of evidence for a RICO conviction.

Jun 2 2026
25-60581 Per Curiam

Bia v. Blanche

The Fifth Circuit dismissed a petition for review challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals denial of a motion to reopen. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate equitable tolling and that her jurisdictional arguments were foreclosed by circuit precedent.

Jun 2 2026
25-11089 Per Curiam

United States v. Haynes

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted a motion for leave to withdraw filed by appointed counsel. The court dismissed the appeal after finding no nonfrivolous issues for appellate review.

Jun 2 2026
24-50745 Per Curiam

United States v. Williams

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the convictions of three defendants involved with a criminal organization known as Killers with Aggression. The court rejected challenges regarding jury instructions on firearms charges and the sufficiency of evidence for a RICO conviction.

Jun 1 2026
25-40637 Per Curiam

United States v. Cruz

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the conviction of a defendant who pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a machinegun. The court held that the defendant failed to demonstrate plain error regarding the sufficiency of the plea colloquy and advisement on forfeiture and special assessments.