11th Cir.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Every decision we've summarized from United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Jul 8 2026
25-13805 Per Curiam

Alfaro Mira v. U.S. Attorney General

The Eleventh Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order denying cancellation of removal. The court held that substantial evidence supported the agency's finding that the petitioner's removal would not cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to her children.

Jul 8 2026
2:25-cv-00564-JLB-DNF Per Curiam

Thomas Pepe v. Saul B. Villalobos, Khaleeb Hoover, Steven Pepe, Luke Lajgi, Christopher Decosta, et al

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's amended civil complaint as an impermissible shotgun pleading. The court held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying further amendment opportunities and that the magistrate judge did not plainly err in failing to recuse himself.

Jul 8 2026
8:21-cr-00342-VMC-SPF-1 Unpublished

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PLAMEN GEORGIEV VELINOV

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of a defendant who managed an international enterprise producing and distributing child sexual abuse material. The court held that the images depicted lascivious exhibitions of minors' genitals and pubic areas, and that the district court properly considered sentencing statistics without violating due process.

Jul 8 2026
1:25-cv-21172-EIS Per Curiam

David W. Langley v. Liza Hazan

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal challenging a district court's remand order and denial of reconsideration. The court concluded it lacked jurisdiction because the remand was based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the attorney fees amount remained undetermined.

Jul 8 2026
5:24-cv-00167-MCR-MJF Per Curiam

Tlusty v. Alexander

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a former federal prisoner's complaint against prison officials for failure to state a claim. The court held that the prisoner's medical and search-and-seizure claims presented a new context for a Bivens action where special factors counseled against extending the remedy.