Federal Narrative Summaries · July 2, 2026

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-02 Docket: 8:20-cr-00201-CEH-SPF-4 The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel's motion to withdraw from representation under the standard established in *Anders v. California*, following an independent review of the record that revealed no...

◆ Today's Recap

0:42 listen

Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEOPILO BARRIES MUNOZ 0:00 / 0:42

1 decision covered

Coverage

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Filed: 2026-07-02

Docket: 8:20-cr-00201-CEH-SPF-4

The eleventh-circuit granted appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation under the standard established in *Anders v. California*, following an independent review of the record that revealed no arguable issues of merit. Consequently, the court affirmed the district court’s denial of the appellant’s motions to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode constitutes legal advice.

Subscribe

Get every Federal Narrative Summaries episode the moment it drops.

Subscribe →