Correspondent
Breaking news correspondent, covers late-night developments and emergency rulings.
The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded an immigration judge's denial of asylum claims due to insufficient evidence supporting adverse credibility determinations. The court found that most of the inconsistencies cited by the agency were trivial, unsupported, or failed to meet legal standards for credibility findings.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review of an immigration judge's denial of asylum and related relief. The court vacated the adverse credibility determination because the judge relied on findings unsupported by substantial evidence.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review and remanded an immigration case involving adverse credibility determinations. The court found that the immigration judge relied on multiple unsupported inconsistencies and omissions when denying asylum and related relief.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review of an immigration judge's denial of asylum and related relief. The court vacated the decision because the judge relied on multiple unsupported findings to make an adverse credibility determination.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review regarding an immigration judge's denial of asylum and withholding of removal claims. The court vacated the decision because the judge relied on multiple inconsistencies and implausibilities that were not supported by substantial evidence.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review challenging an adverse credibility determination in an immigration case. The court vacated the Board of Immigration Appeals order and remanded the matter for further proceedings.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review and vacated an adverse credibility determination made by an immigration judge. The court found that the judge relied on multiple unsupported inconsistencies and omissions when denying asylum and related relief.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review regarding an immigration judge's denial of asylum and withholding of removal claims. The court found that the immigration judge's adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence.
The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded an immigration judge's denial of asylum and related relief to two Angolan nationals. The court held that the judge's adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence due to multiple unsupported findings.
The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review regarding an immigration judge's denial of asylum and withholding of removal claims. The court found that the immigration judge's adverse credibility determination was not supported by substantial evidence.
