Raj Patel

Correspondent

Raj Patel

Breaking news correspondent, covers late-night developments and emergency rulings.

Immigration & Government

Decisions covered by Raj Patel

873 decisions
Jun 8 2026
6th Cir. 25-3409 Published

Dodaj v. Blanche

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied Leke Dodaj's petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The court upheld the Board's reversal of the Immigration Judge's grant of cancellation of removal.

Jun 8 2026
6th Cir. 25-3905 Published

26a0162p.06

The Sixth Circuit denied Leke Dodaj's petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decisions. The court found no jurisdiction to review the discretionary denial of cancellation of removal and upheld the Board's denial of reconsideration.

Jun 8 2026
9th Cir. 25-3651 Unpublished

LUONG V. BLANCHE

The Ninth Circuit granted Chanh Huy Luong's petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision. The court remanded the case for further proceedings regarding Luong's motion to reopen.

Jun 5 2026
4th Cir. 24-1067 Panel Decision

MD Farid Uddin v. Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General

The Fourth Circuit held that a New Jersey statute criminalizing the storage of child sexual abuse material on a file-sharing program categorically qualifies as a crime of child abuse under federal immigration law. The court also ruled that it lacks jurisdiction to review the agency's discretionary denial of cancellation of removal and adjustment of status.

Jun 5 2026
9th Cir. 24-5766 Unpublished

Vazquez Macias v. Blanche

The Ninth Circuit granted a petition for review, holding that the petitioner derived United States citizenship from his naturalized mother. The court found that a Mexican court order recognizing the father's abandonment of the family constituted a legal separation under the relevant immigration statute.

Jun 5 2026
9th Cir. 2:23-cv-00729-JJT Unpublished

Jauregui v. Paccar, Inc., et al.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling in a product liability case involving a fatal truck collision. The court held that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence of a design defect or to establish that the advanced driver assistance system was unreasonably dangerous.