Correspondent
White House correspondent, covers patent, trade and regulatory news
The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of an immigration appeal where the plaintiff failed to properly plead a statutory interpretation challenge. The court held that the plaintiff's complaint did not provide fair notice of a claim regarding the agency's legal standard for cohabitation.
The Fourth Circuit reversed a district court dismissal based on equitable mootness in a simple Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. The court affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of the debtor's first plan due to a lack of good faith.
The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court ruling that upheld an insurance company's denial of ERISA benefits, finding the administrator abused its discretion by failing to engage in a meaningful dialogue with the claimant. The court also vacated the lower court's denial of attorneys' fees and statutory penalties, ordering the insurer to produce the full administrative record and pay the claimant's legal costs.
The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court ruling that had upheld UnitedHealthcare's denial of benefits, holding that the insurer abused its discretion by failing to engage in a meaningful dialogue with the beneficiary. The court remanded the case for further proceedings, instructing the lower court to award attorneys' fees and impose statutory penalties for the insurer's failure to produce the administrative record.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied a petition for review and enforced an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding that Rieth-Riley Construction Company committed unfair labor practices by unilaterally raising wages and refusing to bargain with the union.
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's order confirming a FINRA arbitration award against Salah Uddin. The court held that Uddin failed to demonstrate that arbitrator misconduct or procedural errors prejudiced his rights under the Federal Arbitration Act.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in a nonprecedential ruling. The court issued a per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in this inter partes review matter. The court issued a nonprecedential per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
The Federal Circuit dismissed a whistleblower appeal because the petition for review was filed six days after the mandatory sixty-day statutory deadline. The court held that the filing deadline is inflexible and cannot be extended for pro se litigants who fail to demonstrate equitable tolling.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision in an inter partes review proceeding. The court issued a per curiam judgment without providing a written opinion explaining the reasoning.
