James Taylor

Correspondent

James Taylor

Capitol Hill correspondent, covers legislative and political stories.

Criminal Justice

Decisions covered by James Taylor

2,484 decisions
Jun 24 2026
9th Cir. 25-2828 Unpublished

Salvador-Silvestre v. Blanche

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed a petition for review of an immigration order because it was filed more than seven months after the Board of Immigration Appeals decision. The court found the filing untimely under federal statute and determined the petitioners failed to demonstrate the extraordinary circumstances required for equitable tolling.

Jun 24 2026
11th Cir. 8:23-cr-00071-KKM-SPF-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Lindsey

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentence of a defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court held that police had probable cause to search the rental vehicle and that the sentencing enhancement for possessing a firearm in connection with another felony was properly applied.

Jun 24 2026
11th Cir. 7:05-cr-00012-HL-RLH-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Wright

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a pro se defendant more than fourteen years after the final judgment in his criminal case. The court held that the notice of appeal was untimely and did not qualify for an extension under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Jun 24 2026
9th Cir. 3:23-cr-00301-SI-2 Unpublished

USA v. Centeno Banegas

The Ninth Circuit dismissed an appeal by a defendant convicted of fentanyl conspiracy who had waived his right to appeal. The court found no non-frivolous issues to review after an independent examination of the record.

Jun 24 2026
11th Cir. 2:25-cr-00218-LCB-GMB-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Moore

The Eleventh Circuit vacated a defendant's sentence because the district court failed to provide a specific justification for an upward variance from the Sentencing Guidelines range. The court held that merely reciting statutory factors without explaining their application to the case facts constitutes reversible procedural error.