James Taylor

Correspondent

James Taylor

Capitol Hill correspondent, covers legislative and political stories.

Criminal Justice

Decisions covered by James Taylor

2,484 decisions
Mar 26 2026
11th Cir. 4:24-cr-00003-MW-MAF-2 Per Curiam

United States v. Blackshear

The Eleventh Circuit granted appointed counsel's motion to withdraw from representing the defendant in a direct criminal appeal. The court affirmed the defendant's convictions and sentence after an independent review found no arguable issues of merit.

Mar 26 2026
11th Cir. 1:24-cr-20449-KMM-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Joseph Anthony Cano Bonilla

The Eleventh Circuit granted a joint motion for summary reversal, holding that the government breached its plea agreement by arguing for a higher sentencing guideline range based on the purity of the methamphetamine. The court vacated the within-guideline sentence and remanded the case for resentencing consistent with the terms of the plea agreement.

Mar 26 2026
11th Cir. 2:23-cr-00041-TPB-KCD-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Colon-Ocasio

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a statutory maximum sentence of 840 months for child pornography offenses, ruling that the district court did not abuse its discretion. The court held that the district court properly weighed the need to protect the public over the defendant's mitigating arguments regarding his mental health.

Mar 26 2026
11th Cir. 6:24-cr-00211-PGB-NWH-1 Per Curiam

United States v. Nickens

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a 36-month prison sentence for wire fraud, rejecting the defendant's claim that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an upward variance based on his extensive criminal history. The court held that the sentencing judge properly weighed the defendant's history of fraud and uncharged conduct alongside the seriousness of the offense and the need for public protection.

Mar 26 2026
4th Cir. 25-7041 Per Curiam

Torrean v. Washington

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a state prisoner challenging the timeliness of his habeas corpus petition. The court denied a certificate of appealability because the petitioner failed to demonstrate that the procedural ruling was debatable or that his claim of a constitutional right was substantial.