Aisha Johnson

Correspondent

Aisha Johnson

Federal courthouse correspondent, covers civil rights, employment discrimination, housing rights, and Second Amendment disputes.

Civil Rights & Constitutional

Decisions covered by Aisha Johnson

1,714 decisions
Jun 18 2026
5th Cir. 25-50025 Panel Decision

Marfil v. City of New Braunfels

The Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court ruling upholding a Texas city's zoning ordinance that prohibits short-term rentals in residential districts. The court held that Texas law does not recognize a vested property right to lease a home on a short-term basis and that the ordinance satisfies rational-basis review under the Equal Protection Clause.

Jun 18 2026
6th Cir. 25-3371 Published

NetChoice, LLC v. Yost

The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's judgment that invalidated Ohio's Parental Notification by Social Media Operators Act. The panel held that the trade association NetChoice lacked prudential standing to assert the First Amendment rights of minor users on behalf of its members.

Jun 18 2026
8th Cir. 25-1216 Panel Decision

Tamala J. Jones, Personally, and as the Administratrix of the Estate of Tramon Tyqueze Savage v. Logan K. Kulesa; Shawn M. Jones

The Eighth Circuit dismissed an interlocutory appeal challenging a denial of qualified immunity in a Section nineteen eighty-three excessive force case. The court held that the officers' arguments relied on factual disputes that exceeded the scope of appellate review.

Jun 17 2026
9th Cir. 1:24-cv-00409-DKG Unpublished

Craghtten v. United States, et al.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a challenge to federal firearm purchase requirements. The court held that requiring non-citizens to provide an alien registration number on Form 4473 does not violate the Second Amendment or related statutes.

Jun 17 2026
11th Cir. 2:24-cv-00154-MHT-CWB Per Curiam

Bates v. Macon

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's thirty-five count employment discrimination complaint. The court held that the pleading was an impermissible shotgun complaint that failed to provide defendants adequate notice of the claims against them.