Background
Durrell Kevon Haynes appealed a conviction from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. His appointed attorney moved to withdraw and filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and United States v. Flores, asserting that the appeal presented no nonfrivolous issues. Haynes filed a response to the motion.
The court’s reasoning
The court found that the record was not sufficiently developed to allow for a fair evaluation of Haynes’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Consequently, the court declined to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. The court concurred with the counsel’s assessment that the appeal presented no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
What it means going forward
The appeal is dismissed, preventing further appellate review of the claims in this proceeding, though the defendant may pursue collateral review.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download
