Skip to content
Do It For The Caselaw
  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • About
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
Do It For The Caselaw
  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • About
  • Shop
  • Subscribe
Home / Decisions / United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit / Gonzalez v. Collins
Fed. Cir.

Gonzalez v. Collins

May 11, 2026 ·26-1213 ·Panel Decision · By Raj Patel

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and dismissed in part a Veterans Court decision dismissing a veteran's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court held that res judicata principles do not bar a tribunal from reconsidering its own interlocutory rulings within the same proceeding.

Key takeaways

  • Holding: The Federal Circuit affirmed in part and dismissed in part, holding that res judicata does not bar a tribunal from reconsidering its own interlocutory rulings within the same proceeding and that the appellant failed to raise any legal issues within the court's limited jurisdiction.
  • Vote: Panel Decision
  • Practical effect: Veterans must ensure they use the correct forms and procedures when appealing decisions to the Board of Veterans' Appeals to avoid jurisdictional dismissals. The ruling clarifies that a tribunal may reconsider its own interlocutory decisions within a single case without being barred by res judicata.

Background

Manuel Gonzalez, Jr., a U.S. Air Force veteran, sought service-connected disability benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs. After a regional office denied his request for clear and unmistakable error, he attempted to appeal using a legacy form that had been phased out. The Board of Veterans’ Appeals informed him that no appeal had been docketed and directed him to use a new form. Gonzalez appealed this letter to the Veterans Court, which initially dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction but later reconsidered and reinstated the appeal based on a recent decision. A different judge then dismissed the appeal again, reasoning that the letter was not an appealable decision and that Gonzalez had not argued the validity of his form. Gonzalez then appealed to the Federal Circuit.

The court’s reasoning

The Federal Circuit noted its limited jurisdiction to review only questions of law, excluding factual determinations or the application of law to specific facts. The court identified only one argument from Gonzalez that raised a legal issue: that res judicata principles barred the Veterans Court from reconsidering its prior rulings. The court rejected this argument, stating that res judicata generally applies only after a final judgment in a different proceeding and does not bar reconsideration of interlocutory rulings within the same proceeding. The court found that Gonzalez’s other arguments regarding court conduct and procedural rules did not raise issues within its jurisdiction.

What it means going forward

Veterans must ensure they use the correct forms and procedures when appealing decisions to the Board of Veterans’ Appeals to avoid jurisdictional dismissals. The ruling clarifies that a tribunal may reconsider its own interlocutory decisions within a single case without being barred by res judicata.

Civil Res Judicata Social Security

On this page

Background The court’s reasoning What it means going forward

Share

Related from this court

Jul 17, 2026 Schindler v. Squires Jul 17, 2026 Kelly v. United States Jul 16, 2026 4DD Holdings, LLC v. United States Jul 16, 2026 Bee v. United States
Do It For The Caselaw

Just Do It For the Caselaw!

Site

  • Mission
  • The Anchors
  • Editorial Process
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Read & Listen

  • Decisions
  • Broadcast
  • Topics
  • The Weekly Brief

Follow

© 2026 Do It For The Caselaw. Not legal advice.