Background
Nicholas Vena appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in his favor against Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC, Julie Westerman, and David Schulman. Vena alleged that the defendants conspired with retired Commissioner Jeannie Lowe to violate his due process rights during a marital dissolution proceeding. The district court found no evidence of a conspiracy or joint action sufficient to establish state actor liability.
The court’s reasoning
The court affirmed that only a state actor can be liable under Section nineteen eighty-three. It found no evidence of a conspiracy between the defendants and Commissioner Lowe, noting that the lack of disclosure regarding prior mediations did not prove an agreement to ignore the law. The court further held that there was no substantial coordination or significant financial integration between the law firm and the judge to establish joint action. Regarding state law claims, the court determined that the defendants owed no duty to disclose the judge’s prior engagements or to refrain from hiring her, as the attorney’s duty of loyalty to their client superseded any duty to the opposing party.
What it means going forward
The decision clarifies that private law firms generally do not become state actors merely by retaining retired judges for mediation in unrelated cases, absent a specific agreement to violate constitutional rights.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download