5th Cir.

Matute-Vallecillo v. Blanche

May 14, 2026 ·25-60596 ·Per Curiam · By Raj Patel

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order. The court affirmed the lower tribunal's finding that the petitioner was not a credible witness.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:52

Background

Miljanic Alexander Matute-Vallecillo, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitioned for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The petitioner argued the Board committed legal error regarding credibility findings and the consideration of previously unavailable evidence.

The court’s reasoning

The court found that the petitioner had not shown any error in the credibility ruling, which is dispositive of the withholding claim. The court also determined there was no merit to the argument that the Board erred in applying the standard for previously unavailable evidence. Finally, the court concluded the record belied the challenge that the Board impermissibly considered the adverse credibility finding in its analysis of the Convention Against Torture claim.

What it means going forward

The petition for review is denied, leaving the Board of Immigration Appeals order in place.

Play