Background
Robinetta Henderson appealed a judgment from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent her filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California and moved for leave to withdraw. Henderson did not file a response.
The court’s reasoning
The court reviewed the counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. It concurred with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
United States v. Henderson, No. 25-11155 (5th Cir. May 8, 2026)
What it means going forward
Counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed without a decision on the merits.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download