Background
Deshante Nabors, proceeding pro se, appealed his conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty of a drug offense in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Nabors raised numerous issues on appeal, including the denial of pretrial motions, trial conduct, prosecutorial misconduct, his sentence, and ineffective assistance of counsel.
The court’s reasoning
The court affirmed the denial of the motion to suppress evidence, adopting the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. It found no merit in challenges to the denial of motions to quash the indictment or inspect the grand jury list. Regarding trial-related claims, the court noted Nabors did not provide a transcript and found no evidence of deliberate exclusion of black jurors or a need for a simple possession instruction. The court also found no support for prosecutorial misconduct claims in the record. On sentencing, the court concluded the district court properly calculated the criminal history score and that Nabors failed to show error in the obstruction-of-justice enhancement for making false statements during trial. The court declined to address the ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal.
What it means going forward
The decision upholds the drug conviction and sentence, leaving Nabors without relief on his direct appeal while preserving his ineffective assistance claim for potential collateral review.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download