Omoyoma Okoro was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and bank fraud, as well as the substantive counts of those crimes. The scheme involved defrauding attorneys of millions of dollars. During the trial, Okoro sought to have his brother and co-conspirator, Omoefe Okoro, testify remotely from Canada. Although the District Court allowed remote testimony under strict conditions—requiring Omoefe to appear from a government facility in Canada without government assistance to the defense—the witness never arrived. Okoro was sentenced to 100 months in prison and ordered to pay over $22 million in restitution. On appeal, he argued that the government violated his constitutional rights by allowing his brother to leave the country, that the evidence was insufficient to prove he sent the fraudulent emails, and that he should not be held responsible for the full loss amount caused by his co-conspirators.
The Third Circuit addressed three main issues. First, regarding the Compulsory Process Clause, the court applied the standard from United States v. Mills, requiring the defendant to show that the government deprived him of the opportunity to present evidence, that the evidence was material and favorable, and that the deprivation was arbitrary. The court found that the government took no action to prevent Omoefe from testifying; Omoefe left voluntarily. Furthermore, the defense failed to comply with the District Court's specific conditions for remote testimony, and the witness never showed up. The court also noted that Okoro could not prove the testimony would have been material or favorable since his own counsel admitted Omoefe had not given a straight answer on the key facts. Second, on sufficiency of the evidence, the court applied the standard of whether any reasonable juror could accept the evidence as sufficient. The testimony of co-conspirator Henry Okpalefe was detailed, describing conversations with Okoro and presenting authenticated emails from the address in question that used Okoro's characteristic speech patterns. This evidence was sufficient to link Okoro to the scheme. Third, regarding the loss amount, the court reviewed for clear error. The District Court found a loss of over $22 million based on a spreadsheet of 78 victims. Okoro's argument that he was unaware of other activities was rejected because the record showed he frequently communicated with co-conspirators about the larger fraud scheme, making him jointly responsible for the total loss.
The decision affirms the conviction and sentence, leaving Okoro with a 100-month prison term and over $22 million in restitution. It reinforces the requirement that defendants must strictly adhere to court-imposed conditions when seeking remote witness testimony and clarifies that a defendant in a conspiracy is liable for the total loss caused by the scheme if they participated in communications regarding the broader criminal activity.
Podcast (federal-narrative-summaries): Play in new window | Download