4th Cir.

JOHN COX v. WARDEN CARLOS BIVENS

March 17, 2026 ·25-6773 ·Per Curiam · By James Taylor

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal regarding a habeas corpus petition filed by John Cox. The court denied a certificate of appealability because the petitioner failed to show that the district court's procedural ruling was debatable.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

John Cox filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The district court dismissed the petition as untimely under the one-year statute of limitations. Cox sought to appeal this dismissal.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that an order dismissing a habeas petition as untimely is not appealable unless a certificate of appealability is issued. Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, a certificate will not issue absent a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. The court independently reviewed the record and concluded Cox had not made this requisite showing.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents further appellate review of the district court’s decision to dismiss the habeas petition as untimely.

Play