4th Cir.

Lawrence Charles v. Leesburg Police Department

March 26, 2026 ·26-6025 ·Per Curiam · By Aisha Johnson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a pro se plaintiff challenging a district court order. The court held that the order in question was neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 0:54

Background

Lawrence Charles, proceeding pro se, sought to appeal a district court order that dismissed one claim and granted him leave to file a third amended complaint under Section nineteen eighty-three of Title forty-two. The appeal originated from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that its jurisdiction is limited to final orders under Section twelve ninety-one of Title twenty-eight and certain interlocutory or collateral orders under Section twelve ninety-two of Title twenty-eight. The order Charles sought to appeal did not meet these criteria. The court cited Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corporation to support this limitation.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents the plaintiff from pursuing the appeal on the merits until a final judgment is entered or a specific interlocutory order is issued.