7th Cir.

Stingley v. Laci Transport Inc.

April 2, 2026 ·24-1613 ·Panel Decision ·Rovner · By Maria Santos

The Seventh Circuit affirmed summary judgment for trucking defendants, holding that shuttle drivers moving auto parts within Illinois were engaged in interstate commerce. Consequently, the drivers are exempt from state and federal overtime wage requirements under the Motor Carrier Act.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 3:09

Current and former shuttle truck drivers filed class action lawsuits against their employers, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Illinois Minimum Wage Law, and the Chicago Minimum Wage Law. The drivers transported automobile parts manufactured outside of Illinois from temporary storage lots to a Ford assembly plant in Chicago. Although the drivers' routes were physically entirely within Illinois, the parts originated out of state and were destined for the assembly plant. The drivers sought unpaid overtime wages, arguing their work was purely intrastate. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants, ruling that the drivers fell under the Motor Carrier Act exemption, and the plaintiffs appealed.

The court's analysis centered on whether the shuttle drivers' intrastate routes were part of a continuous interstate journey, which would trigger the Motor Carrier Act exemption from overtime pay. The court applied the 'continuous movement' test established in prior precedent, specifically Collins v. Heritage Wine Cellars. Under this test, a shipment remains in interstate commerce if the halt in movement is merely a convenient intermediate step in the process of getting goods to their final destination. The court found that the storage lots were not the final destination but merely staging areas for parts that were needed at the assembly plant within two to three days. The court noted that Ford controlled the parts while in storage, directed their subsequent transportation, and bore the ultimate responsibility for the transportation charges. Furthermore, no processing or modification occurred at the storage lots. The plaintiffs argued that the storage lots and the assembly plant constituted a single 'Ford Assembly Campus' destination. The court rejected this, citing stipulated facts that defined the assembly plant at a specific address distinct from the storage lots, which were separated by miles and public roads. The court emphasized that the journey did not end until the parts were unloaded at the assembly plant, meaning the shuttle drivers' movements were an integral part of the uninterrupted interstate journey.

The decision affirms the dismissal of the class action suits for unpaid wages, confirming that shuttle drivers moving goods between out-of-state origins and final destinations via temporary intrastate storage are exempt from overtime laws. The ruling clarifies that geographic proximity alone does not make a storage facility the final destination, preserving the MCA exemption for similar logistics operations where goods are staged before final delivery.

Play