Federal Daily Recap: Friday, July 10, 2026

Federal appellate daily recap for Friday, July 10, 2026.

Table of contents

1. 0:00 Opening headlines
2. 0:49 David Chen
3. 0:51 James Taylor: Criminal Justice
4. 3:44 David Chen
5. 3:47 Aisha Johnson: Civil Rights & Constitutional
6. 5:00 David Chen
7. 5:05 Michael Reeves: Supreme Court & Constitutional
8. 6:51 David Chen
9. 6:54 Maria Santos: Business & Regulatory
10. 8:51 David Chen
11. 8:55 Raj Patel: Immigration & Government
12. 11:04 David Chen

Coverage

Opening headlines

Welcome to Do It For The Case Law for Friday, July tenth, two thousand twenty-six. Visit do it for the case law dot com to listen to more in-depth, per-case reporting. Today’s docket features sixty-eight federal appellate decisions across nine circuits. We have coverage on criminal justice matters including drug trafficking and firearms cases with James Taylor. Aisha Johnson brings civil rights updates covering…

David Chen

Let’s turn to James covering criminal justice.

James Taylor: Criminal Justice

Thanks, David. Twenty-six cases across five circuits today. The disposition rollup shows eight affirmances, ten dismissals, three denials, one vacatur with a remand, and four other dispositions including procedural rulings. Starting in the Eleventh Circuit, the court vacated Rolex Bryan Bruno’s carjacking conviction and remanded for a new trial after finding plain error in an Allen charge that omitted critical…

David Chen

Thanks, James. Now for civil rights coverage with Aisha.

Aisha Johnson: Civil Rights & Constitutional

Thanks, David. Five cases on my beat today. Four were affirmed or dismissed, one was split with a remand. The Fourth Circuit split its decision in the age discrimination case against Dr. Lee, affirming summary judgment on most claims but vacating and remanding his specific retaliation claim regarding the accelerated removal timeline from his neurosurgery chair position to determine if age was the but-for cause or if…

David Chen

Thanks, Aisha. Now for constitutional and habeas developments with Michael.

Michael Reeves: Supreme Court & Constitutional

Thanks, David. Seven cases in this block: five affirmed, one dismissed, and one denied. In the Eleventh Circuit, the court affirmed liability against Hillsborough County for wrongful death while rejecting a Fourth Amendment claim against Deputy Mark Clark, holding that the Sheriff’s Office lost sovereign immunity by failing to notify the decedent’s parents and release him to a responsible adult as an operational…

David Chen

Thanks, Michael. Now Maria has the business and civil law roundup.

Maria Santos: Business & Regulatory

Thanks, David. Fourteen cases across four circuits. The Fourth Circuit handled six, the Sixth Circuit dismissed one, the Seventh Circuit remanded one, and the Ninth Circuit decided six. In the Fourth Circuit, we see two outcomes that changed the lower court’s result: Dmarcian versus Pressly McAuley Millen was reversed on a civil contempt finding because there was no clear evidence of actual harm to the opposing…

David Chen

Thanks, Maria. Now for immigration and government updates, let’s turn to Raj.

Raj Patel: Immigration & Government

Thanks, David. Sixteen cases from today’s docket in immigration and government law. The disposition rollup includes two affirmances, five dismissals, three denials, one split outcome, and five vacaturs with remands or rehearings. Leading the day, the Fifth Circuit vacated its own panel opinion in consolidated immigration cases involving Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez, Alejandro Villegas Angel, and Miguel Angel Gomez…

David Chen

That wraps up Do It For The Case Law for Friday, July tenth, two thousand twenty-six. Thank you to our reporters: James Taylor with twenty-six cases on criminal justice and violent crimes; Aisha Johnson with five cases covering civil rights; Michael Reeves with seven cases on constitutional law and habeas petitions; Maria Santos with fourteen cases on business, labor, and civil matters; and Raj Patel with sixteen…

Do It For The Case Law is a legal news and research publication. This episode is not legal advice.