11th Cir.

Brown v. Warden, FCI Marianna Miles Unit Manager

July 7, 2026 ·5:25-cv-00356-AW-MJF ·Per Curiam · By Aisha Johnson

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by a federal prisoner because the notice of appeal was premature. The court held that a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is not a final, appealable order until the district court adopts it.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:09

Background

Tiffany Brown, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging Eighth Amendment violations. She filed motions for preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order. A magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation recommending denial of the motions. Brown filed a notice of appeal designating the report and recommendation before the district court adopted it.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that a final judgment leaves nothing for the district court to do but execute the judgment. A magistrate judge’s recommendation that has not been adopted by the district court is not final and immediately appealable. The district court’s subsequent adoption of the report and recommendation did not cure the defect of the premature appeal.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents the appellate court from reviewing the merits of the prisoner’s Eighth Amendment claims or the denial of injunctive relief. All pending motions in the case are denied as moot.