5th Cir.

Veals v. Hedgemon

July 6, 2026 ·25-30687 ·Per Curiam · By Aisha Johnson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed an appeal filed by an incarcerated plaintiff who sought to proceed in forma pauperis. The court found the appeal lacked arguable merit because the claims were time-barred or failed to state a cognizable constitutional issue.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:12

Background

Brian A. Veals, an inmate at the B.B. Rayburn Correctional Center in Louisiana, appealed the dismissal of his civil rights complaint under Section nineteen hundred eighty-three of Title forty-two of the United States Code. He alleged deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs and the opening of his legal mail outside his presence. Veals moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on this appeal.

The court’s reasoning

The court concluded that the deliberate indifference claims were prescribed because the suit was filed more than one year after Veals became aware of his claims, exceeding the applicable prescriptive period. Regarding the mail-opening claims, Veals did not challenge the district court’s conclusion that they failed to raise a cognizable constitutional issue, effectively abandoning any such challenge. The court found Veals had not shown a nonfrivolous issue for appeal, rendering the appeal lacking arguable merit.

What it means going forward

The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike under Section one thousand nine hundred fifteen of Title twenty-eight of the United States Code. If Veals accumulates three strikes, he will be barred from proceeding in forma pauperis in any future civil action or appeal while incarcerated unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.