11th Cir.

Jamal Allen v. The State of Alabama

July 2, 2026 ·1:25-cv-00222-JB-MU ·Per Curiam · By Raj Patel

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed an appeal seeking to enjoin an arrest warrant as moot. The court found the case moot because the appellant had already been arrested and was facing ongoing criminal proceedings.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / --:--

Background

Jamal Allen, proceeding pro se, appealed a district court order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The motion sought to stop the appellees from arresting him under a warrant issued in Baldwin County, Alabama.

The court’s reasoning

The court determined that the appeal was moot because Allen had been arrested under the warrant and was in ongoing criminal proceedings. The court cited precedent stating that an issue is moot when it no longer presents a live controversy for which the court can provide effectual relief. The court noted that intervening events can moot an appeal even if the underlying order was immediately appealable when entered.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents the appellate court from ruling on the merits of the injunction request, leaving the arrest warrant and criminal proceedings unaffected by the appeal.