4th Cir.

In re ROBERT MICHAEL ARDIS

June 30, 2026 ·26-1378 ·Per Curiam · By Raj Patel

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a Florida prisoner. The court held that it lacks jurisdiction to hear such petitions directly under the governing federal statute.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:24

Background

Robert Michael Ardis, a Florida prisoner proceeding pro se, petitioned the Fourth Circuit for a writ of habeas corpus seeking immediate release from state custody. The petition was submitted on June 25, 2026, and decided on June 30, 2026.

The court’s reasoning

The court explained that while 28 U.S.C. Section 2241(a) grants the Supreme Court, any justice thereof, district courts, and any circuit judge within their respective jurisdictions the power to grant writs of habeas corpus, it does not confer jurisdiction on courts of appeals. The court cited Dragenice v. Ridge to clarify that jurisdiction is limited to individual circuit judges, not the appellate court as a body. Although the court has the authority to transfer petitions under 28 U.S.C. Section 1631, it concluded that transfer was not in the interest of justice in this instance.

Writs of habeas corpus may be granted by the Supreme Court, any justice thereof, the district courts and any circuit judge within their respective jurisdictions.

28 U.S.C. Section 2241(a)

What it means going forward

The dismissal reinforces the jurisdictional limitation that federal appellate courts cannot directly grant habeas relief, requiring petitioners to seek relief from district courts or individual circuit judges.