4th Cir.

James v. Sonnendecker

April 27, 2026 ·25-2425 ·Per Curiam · By Aisha Johnson

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief in a Bivens action brought by a pro se appellant. The court held that the appellant failed to allege sufficient facts for recognized constitutional violations and that the defendants were protected by absolute prosecutorial immunity.

Background

Anthony Glenn James filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics. The district court accepted a magistrate judge’s recommendation and denied James’s complaint. James appealed the order to the Fourth Circuit.

The court’s reasoning

The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It determined that James failed to allege sufficient facts showing that his claims constituted constitutional violations recognized by Bivens. Additionally, the court held that Appellees Christopher Lietzow and Carra Henderson are protected by absolute prosecutorial immunity.

James fails to allege sufficient facts showing that his claims constitute constitutional violations recognized by Bivens.

James v. Sonnendecker, No. 25-2425 (4th Cir. 2026)

What it means going forward

The decision reinforces the high bar for pleading Bivens claims and confirms that federal prosecutors retain absolute immunity from suit for actions within their prosecutorial role.