4th Cir.

RACHEL A. ROYER v. SYNEOS HEALTH, LLC

April 27, 2026 ·25-2035 ·Per Curiam · By Aisha Johnson

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court dismissal of a Title VII claim alleging failure to accommodate religious beliefs. The appellate court found no reversible error in the lower court's determination that the plaintiff failed to meet the statutory time limit for filing her claim.

Background

Rachel A. Royer appealed a district court order granting a motion to dismiss her civil action against Syneos Health, LLC. Royer alleged the defendant failed to accommodate her religious beliefs in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of nineteen sixty-four, and raised federal constitutional and state law fraud claims. The appeal originated from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

The court’s reasoning

The court found that the district court correctly determined Royer failed to establish that extraordinary circumstances beyond her control prevented her from complying with the ninety-day statutory time limit applicable to her Title VII claim. The court also affirmed the dismissal of the remaining claims, citing the requirement that reasonable detrimental reliance upon a misrepresentation must be pleaded with particularity for fraud actions and noting that North Carolina has no freestanding claim for punitive damages.

What it means going forward

The decision reinforces the strict application of statutory time limits in Title VII cases and clarifies pleading requirements for fraud claims in the Fourth Circuit and North Carolina.