10th Cir.

Hall v. Miller, et al.

June 17, 2026 ·26-6034 ·Panel Decision ·Gregory A. Phillips · By James Taylor

The Tenth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability to a state prisoner challenging the timeliness of his habeas petition. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal, finding the prisoner failed to meet the requirements for equitable tolling or the firm-waiver exception.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 1:19

Background

Michael Amir Hall was convicted in Oklahoma state court in May 2022 for drug trafficking and possession. After state appeals failed, he filed a federal habeas petition in April 2025, raising claims about probable cause hearings. The district court dismissed the petition as untimely and for failing to preserve objections to a magistrate’s recommendation. Hall appealed, seeking a certificate of appealability and permission to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court’s reasoning

The court held that Hall failed to make a substantial showing that jurists of reason would debate the district court’s procedural rulings. Regarding the firm-waiver rule, the court found Hall’s objections were conclusory and did not fit the interests-of-justice exception because they did not address the specific failure to exhaust remedies. Regarding equitable tolling, the court found Hall did not pursue his rights diligently and that a prison lockdown is not an extraordinary circumstance absent additional proof that it prevented filing.

What it means going forward

The dismissal prevents further appellate review of Hall’s habeas claims on the merits, leaving the state court convictions and sentences in place.