June 10, 2026·25-1487·Panel Decision·Per Curiam·By Maria Santos
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in a nonprecedential ruling. The three-judge panel issued a per curiam judgment without providing detailed reasoning.
This appeal arose from a proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in case number IPR two thousand twenty-three zero one two five six. Innos LLC, represented by Christian E. Mammen, appealed the Board’s decision to the Federal Circuit. Opticis Co., Ltd., represented by Michael Jones, argued for the appellee.
The court’s reasoning
The court issued a per curiam judgment affirming the lower decision pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule thirty-six. No detailed legal reasoning or analysis was provided in the published text.
What it means going forward
The affirmation stands as a final determination on the merits of the appeal, though the nonprecedential nature limits its value as binding legal authority for future cases.
