5th Cir.

Bondarev v. Blanche

June 11, 2026 ·25-60380 ·Per Curiam · By Raj Patel

The Fifth Circuit denied a petition for review challenging the denial of asylum and withholding of removal. The court found the petitioner failed to show the agency's decision lacked substantial evidence.

Listen to this decision 0:00 / 0:57

Background

Vadim Bondarev, a native and citizen of Russia, sought asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The Immigration Judge denied the application, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed. Bondarev petitioned for review, challenging only the denial of asylum and withholding of removal.

The court’s reasoning

The court held that Bondarev failed to demonstrate that the evidence compels a conclusion contrary to the agency’s determination regarding the nexus between his political opinion and the harm suffered. The court also found he did not demonstrate a realistic possibility that the Board would have found error in his former counsel’s citation errors.

What it means going forward

The denial of asylum and withholding of removal stands, and the petitioner remains subject to removal.